, , , , , , ,

(edit: The Trouble With the TPP, Day 50)

So the TPP is finally out of the shadows, sure took its sweet time. I’m not writing this soon after the fact though, no, I had other things in mind, but now is the time to ponder again on this beast which owes its possible existence to the carelessness of democratic societies and the un-involvement of its citizens. Time to turn our cogitative energies to what we once could only access through leaked top secret documentation.

It’s as ugly as ever it was, no wonder those responsible for it were so adamant in keeping it locked away, hiding their shame away from full public scrutiny.

This is inspired from the The Trouble with the TPP series by Michal Geist, one of the rare Canadian voices soberly digging through the language of the agreement, analyzing its framework, explaining its contents and practical implications.

The Trouble with the TPP, Day 1: U.S. Blocks Balancing Objectives.

The Trouble with the TPP, Day 15: Weak Anti-Span Law Standards.

This was written as a response to the Day 14 article, completed then posted as a reply to the Day 15 article.

    This whole affair is beyond improper, it’s passed obscene and the combined imagination efforts of great fiction writers everywhere. It’s the epitome of total bonkers. It’s a carefully crafted temper tantrum thrown by radical capitalists, forget the concept of investor-states, financial maniacs driven in psychosis to officialize their status as ruling class through international legislation.

    It’s confirmation of the financial empires and the crowning of the corporate kingdoms, with their own sets of rules of law, rights and privilege to set them apart from the lowly citizens who are bound by the laws of those very same countries whose supposed representatives are willing to sign away their rights and freedoms, after secretly negotiating the terms no less, with not even the pretended effort of transparency or public consent, with a smile and all the world’s assurances that it’s for their best interest, in a deal that considers them nothing more than a workforce of consumers and which amounts for the democratic state to capitulation and submission of its national sovereignty to the dying throws of a perishing ideology, a dying model of wealth and prosperity unfit to survive the future of humanity without violently imposing it’s will through the institutionalized injustice of corrupt governments, the careful control and flow of misinformation, distraction and confusion, through fear mongering, intimidation, market manipulation and financial trickery, establishing an industrial economic construct of their own fancy as the obviously superior and unquestionable administrative path to follow and in which they legally own all the rights and are the all knowing masters and only relevant authority on, answerable only to tribunals of their own making, bullying their way with the power of capital through multifaceted agreements that will ultimately profit not the general population to be bound by them, who will in all considerations not benefit in any substantial way from this -quite the contrary as many alternatives would by far better serve the common good, this Day 15 in The Trouble with… series give a good example-, but the very same who have already shown an incredible ability to abuse a system already skewed in their favor.

    It’s a take it or leave it endeavor too isn’t it? At this juncture, it’s sign it as is or step back. Does anybody actually believe our elected officials have any intention of rejecting such insanity, of backing out of this obviously unsatisfactory deal? They (should) know all about this preposterous content already and yet they continue entertaining it, they continue trying to sell its merits to their constituents. It stinks. It belongs in the dictionary next to the word stinks. It reeks of political corruption and conflict of interest. It’s a sell out plain and simple. A cheap cleverly orchestrated sell out meant to pass as the important and unavoidable historic treaty of global cooperation and trade, the symbol of our common efforts in a struggle towards a more just and more fair world, the unanimous declaration from a diversity of peoples and nations to strive together in solidarity towards a better future for humanity, a true and collectively debated through transparent public means accord of free collaboration and exchange between equals, the authentic partnership that we really need. A poor substitute.

    Instead we are left with only two options: accept or reject the legislative nightmare dreamed up by chief industry and corporate lobby in secret over the better part of the last decade and approved by seemingly unaccountable powerless politicians. At this point, their un-mandated competence in brokering such biased alliances is questionable. This is beyond their jurisdiction, beyond the power and responsibilities their short terms in office can bare. It breaches the trust of the democratic system.  It makes a mockery of the ideals and value nations like ours seek to build themselves upon. It’s beyond nonsense, is drivel… take out your thesauruses!… in this age of environmental and climate awareness, it’s a near criminal waste of energy and resources on solutions which will only make matters worse for in near practicality the entirety of worldwide populations, not to speak of those living in the involved countries.

    M. Geist I find words unable to express the appreciation I have of the serious hard work you display in analyzing these documents for us and shedding a much needed light on the issues they raise. Thank you.